The Onboarding
Introductory & tutorial content. Zero-to-one implementation for junior-to-mid-level practitioners grasping core Kubernetes concepts.
Do you have a story about scaling, securing, or troubleshooting Kubernetes? We're looking for real-world engineering challenges, open source deep dives, and advanced architectural patterns — not product pitches.
Whether you want to road-test your KubeCon presentation or give your first-ever technical talk, our Program Committee is here to support you. We pride ourselves on providing constructive feedback to help you polish your narrative before you take the stage.
We welcome speakers from every background — CNCF maintainers and first-time local presenters alike — provided the session brings engineering depth rather than a sales pitch.
Every submission is classified into one of four tracks so our agenda stays balanced for newcomers and veterans alike.
Introductory & tutorial content. Zero-to-one implementation for junior-to-mid-level practitioners grasping core Kubernetes concepts.
Internals, advanced debugging, eBPF, complex networking, cluster security, and observability for senior engineers and SREs.
Emerging CNCF Sandbox projects, AI/ML infrastructure, eBPF innovations, and next-generation cloud native tech.
High-level system design, technical debt, compliance, Kubernetes FinOps, and resilient enterprise platforms for leadership.
Send your proposal with a clear thesis and takeaway. Real production stories and architectural deep-dives score highest.
Every submission is scored against four criteria: content quality, community relevance, vendor neutrality, and architectural impact.
Strong topics with rough structure get routed to mentorship — we'd rather help you sharpen the story than decline it outright.
The full co-organizer team reviews the shortlist monthly and slots talks, balancing track diversity and local speakers.
Present to a room of engaged practitioners who showed up specifically to learn from you — no pitch decks required.
This is the one criterion with veto power. Everything else is coachable — this one protects the audience's time.
Content Quality & Structure — Does the proposal show engineering rigor and a coherent narrative arc, or is it unstructured and unclear? Unclear or AI-generated-without-review proposals are auto-declined.
Community Relevance — Does this topic matter to the Austin cloud native audience right now? Timely, high-impact topics (breaking changes, major ecosystem shifts, critical security patterns) are prioritized.
Vendor Neutrality (the integrity gate) — Is this a "Product Pitch" (proprietary features, pricing, "book a demo" CTAs) or a "Community Standard" talk (architectural patterns, unbiased real-life stories, CNCF project deep-dives)? Pure product pitches are a hard reject; CNCF maintainer deep-dives on graduated/incubating projects are exempt from needing a comparative-architecture slide.
Architectural Impact & Scalability — Homelab/sandbox-scale content is welcome as a lightning talk; hyperscale topics like multi-region federation, zero-trust at scale, and fleet-wide cost optimization are flagged as potential headliners.
Proposals averaging above 3 stars across all four criteria are shortlisted for scheduling. A strict 1-star vendor-neutrality score is an automatic decline, regardless of the other scores.
Submissions are reviewed on a rolling basis. The Program Committee will reach out with feedback either way.